User talk:162.246.153.193

December 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Completionist, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 23:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Completionist. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Completionist, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 00:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * how is putting the truth disruptive? Quit shilling for him and hiding what him and his family has done.
 * He HAS been accused, with good evidence I might ass, of fraud, embezzlement, and misleading people. 162.246.153.193 (talk) 00:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Davest3r08. I noticed that you made a comment on the page The Completionist that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Davest3r08 > : ) (talk)  19:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Won't let me add the fact that jirard Khalil is accused of fraud
title says it.

This is a factual statement. 162.246.153.193 (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please assume good faith. Wikipedia has high standards for the information we include in our articles, especially for articles about people - we don't just add information without any reliable evidence, even if we believe it's true. If you have proof to support your claims, you must do so with cited sources, the same way you would cite evidence in an essay or academic paper. In this case, the information about his charity being investigated is already included in the article; I can assure you, no "shilling" is taking place. This is still an ongoing event, so we may not have all the full details until officials properly investigate the charity and more reliable sources come out. Until then, we can only wait and see. Thanks, PantheonRadiance (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)