User talk:162.246.230.11

July 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, History of Texas. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 02:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to History of Texas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk) 02:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of Texas, you may be blocked from editing. ARandomName123 (talk) 02:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at History of Texas. Boyinaroom (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 23:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)