User talk:163.1.32.35

February 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to William Ewart Gladstone seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to St Gregory the Great Catholic School, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shenme (talk) 02:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas William McDonald, you may be blocked from editing.  Schwede 66  01:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Appleby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, you may be blocked from editing. Stating that a firm is one of "the most prestigious" of its kind in an article is considered promotional if it is not supported with reliable, independent sources. wikitigresito (talk) 17:28, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peyo. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)