User talk:163.153.222.253

April 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in Aztec civilization. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hera, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:08, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Africanized bee has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Africanized bee was changed by 163.153.222.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921303 on 2017-11-08T15:38:41+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emerald ash borer. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Emerald ash borer was changed by 163.153.222.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897737 on 2017-11-08T15:38:45+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Africanized bee, you may be blocked from editing. LakesideMiners (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Africanized bee. LakesideMiners (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Swan


Hello, 163.153.222.253. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Swan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:17, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that in this edit to Slavery during the American Civil War, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Burning of washingtom


A tag has been placed on Talk:Burning of washingtom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ComplexRational (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Nigos. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to First Battle of Bull Run have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 12:11, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Hello, I'm DFW FAA Brianvators. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Color symbolism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 13:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of mountain peaks of Mexico—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Burnt Hills-Ballston Lake Central School District—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)