User talk:163.251.239.4

Conflict of Interest
Hello, 163.251.239.4. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. '''Note: Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines, especially before editing any articles related to the United States military or government. Thank you''' - wolf  11:19, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. Your recent edit to the page Bone Thugs-n-Harmony appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 04:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fire prevention has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:17, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Naming law
Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Naming law article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 05:45, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Samuel Wilson— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   06:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gerda Taro. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  00:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Chatan Yara. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  General Ization Talk  00:32, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Hello, I'm Mike Novikoff. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to You Get What You Give (song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. — Mike Novikoff 07:15, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Saul Rubinek, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wellspring Preparatory High School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Ashley  yoursmile!  06:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at USS Curtis Wilbur. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. '' Note: Also look up WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:OR & WP:EW. These are important policies & guidelines to know.'' - wolf  11:12, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.