User talk:164.215.234.219

April 2021
Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Notre-Dame de Paris have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Notre-Dame de Paris. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Notre-Dame de Paris was changed by 164.215.234.219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859786 on 2021-04-17T12:05:14+00:00

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   12:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.