User talk:164.51.242.10

October 2020
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dian Fossey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dian Fossey, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. If you want to just mention the book was published, that's fine, but you're adding in claims (e.g. "it's the first book...") that require a citation. DonIago (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rachel Dolezal—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 20:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2004 Haitian coup d'état have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2004 Haitian coup d'état was changed by 164.51.242.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957211 on 2021-07-09T14:07:56+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2004 Haitian coup d'état, you may be blocked from editing.   Tommi1986 let's talk! 14:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dian Fossey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Peaceray (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Andrew Gillum—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. EN - Jungwon  18:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Amber Turd


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Amber Turd, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 05:36, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kat Tenbarge seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kat Tenbarge. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Willie Taggart—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 13:20, 28 November 2022 (UTC)