User talk:164.68.187.52

March 2023
Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:32, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Why is it inappropriate, and what is the appropriate forum to suggest a new essay then?


 * It's a perennial whataboutism that's been rejected, and it was wrapped around an attack on Wikipedia editors as some sort of Nazi-equivalent bunch of Communists. If you had actually read the essay, it chiefly concerns Wikipedia's rejection of editors who espouse viewpoints that some classes of people have no right to exist. The vast majority of the people we see who behave that way are Nazi-adjacent. Some might espouse Maoism or Stalinism. We just don't see many Pol Pot-adjacent editors who troll the encyclopedia.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * That essay would be a good idea. Outside of the echo chamber that Wikipedia has become, the encyclopedia is widely viewed as left-wing propaganda (even by one of the co-founders). Can you direct me to the appropriate forum to suggest a new essay please?
 * If your goal is to go from place to place with the "left-wing propaganda" business and demands for false symmetry, no. Larry Sanger has been consistently wrong about Wikipedia since about 2003. We're done here.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:16, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * There must be an appropriate forum to discuss very real concerns about Wikipedia's obvious left wing (or other) biases? If there are not, then there should be maintaining neutrality is an ongoing process that requires constant self-examination. Your slam dunk refusal to even discuss these issues is just making the problem worse.