User talk:164.82.46.5

Welcome!
Hi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Some other site policies and guidelines you may find useful

 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We merely summarize reliable sources without elaboration or interpretation.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are.

Reformulated:


 * "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.
 * Material must be proportionate to what is found in the source cited. If a source makes a small claim and presents two larger counter claims, the material it supports should present one claim and two counter claims instead of presenting the one claim as extremely large while excluding or downplaying the counter claims.
 * We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.

Also, not a policy or guideline, but something important to understand the above policies and guidelines: Wikipedia operates off of objective information, which is information that multiple persons can examine and agree upon. It does not include subjective information, which only an individual can know from an "inner" or personal experience. Most religious beliefs fall under subjective information. Wikipedia may document objective statements about notable subjective claims (i.e. "Christians believe Jesus is divine"), but it does not pretend that subjective statements are objective, and will expose false statements masquerading as subjective beliefs (cf. Indigo children).

You may also want to read User:Ian.thomson/ChristianityAndNPOV. We at Wikipedia are highbrow (snobby), heavily biased for the academia.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary. We're not a directory, nor a forum, nor a place for you to "spread the word".

If you are here to promote pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say.

Happy Editing! OgamD218 (talk) 08:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Xexerss. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Inuyasha characters without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Xexerss (talk) 19:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Inuyasha characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 21:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Desta, Micel
0154-0216 164.82.46.5 (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to British Museum Reading Room, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Andethyst. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to United States Army Futures Command—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  Andethyst  (talk)  16:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at American football in the United States, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 06:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. Your recent edit to List of free and open-source software packages appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm FatalFit. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nat Turner's slave rebellion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dylan &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 21:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nat Turner's slave rebellion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  19:55, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samar Chatterje (May 27)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samar Chatterje and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Samar_Chatterje Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Samar_Chatterje reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Erika Kullberg
Hello, 164.82.46.5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erika Kullberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kush Gods—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:21, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kush Gods, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Erika Kullberg


Hello, 164.82.46.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erika Kullberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm StartOkayStop. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Serayah (actress) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. StartOkayStop (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dentistry in the United States, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (bojo) (they/them)  (talk)  20:44, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Survivor (American TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd  (talk)  20:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Survivor (American TV series). Schazjmd  (talk)  21:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anne Hill (artist)
Hello, 164.82.46.5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne Hill (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Anne Hill (artist)


Hello, 164.82.46.5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Anne Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)