User talk:164.82.84.20

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of singer-songwriters has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:50, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of singer-songwriters was changed by 164.82.84.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883384 on 2018-03-28T15:50:03+00:00.

July 2019
Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Act Up (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You did not update the URL required to access the new peak. This is tantamount to adding unsourced material. Please don't update peaks without updating the accompanying URL (if there is one) and the accessdate. Thank you.  Ss  112   09:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reparations for slavery have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:51, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter Newsham has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter Newsham was changed by 164.82.84.20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879632 on 2019-12-10T21:19:13+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Newsham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 911ChickenCop (talk) 21:30, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re: Peter Newsham
Some of the statements in the article need rephrasing, but the sources back the basic details of each incident. Removing everything from the article simply because it makes Newsham look bad does not adhere to WP:NPOV. I'm going to work through and rephrase statements for accuracy now. Please stop your deletions in the meantime. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Newsham. ''You cannot just blank an article. If you want to propose it for deletion, ask how to do that, but when editors clearly are against removing huge amounts of content, it is wildly inappropriate to do so'' Nosebagbear (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Please note, the biographical article on Peter Newsham has now been rewritten for a more balanced, neutral tone. If you still have concerns about the article or wish to suggest further improvements, please discuss them on the article's Talk page for concensus.  JGHowes   talk  16:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that in this edit to Serbianisation, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  00:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Purely politically motivated Bulgarian propaganda. 164.82.84.20 (talk) 00:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

This is pure Bulgarian propaganda with no substance 164.82.84.20 (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Bulgarian millet are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 06:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)