User talk:165.16.47.4

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Abd al-Mu'min, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 01:54, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, 165.16.47.4, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 03:11, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Unjustified sources removal and misrepresentation of other sources
Don't remove the sources without a valid explanation and don't misrepresent a source like you did with the Spanish one (that not only doesn't mention the Almoravids, but is also riddled with errors: eg. saying that Oran is in Morocco). M.Bitton (talk) 02:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Oz\InterAct 07:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Almohad Caliphate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @R Prazeres sense when adding sources is considered vandalism? 165.16.47.4 (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't pretend like you're not deleting material and replacing it with nationalist POV material, which is exactly what this IP was previously blocked for. Don't repeat these disruptive edits or you will be blocked again, quite simply. R Prazeres (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.R Prazeres (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Almohad Caliphate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 18:46, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.