User talk:165.166.164.202

November 2022
Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Eriophorum have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Plant surfer 17:53, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amorphophallus paeoniifolius. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amorphophallus paeoniifolius was changed by 165.166.164.202 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954403 on 2022-11-16T16:34:41+00:00

December 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Zygomycota—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ascomycota. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 16:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Basidiomycota, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Basidiomycota was changed by 165.166.164.202 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960373 on 2022-12-01T18:17:09+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Speck ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 16:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brian May, you may be blocked from editing. --Jaellee (talk) 18:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arthur Mitchell (dancer). David Biddulph (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nathaniel Parker Gage School. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)