User talk:165.225.32.70

May 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Early Cyrillic alphabet, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Peter  Sam   Fan  15:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits
Hello. In the course of your recent edits at Boris I of Bulgaria, Bulgarian Greek Catholic Church, and Zograf monastery, you have repeatedly changed content to say something that the cited source does not say, without adding any reliable citations of your own. If you read the academic reference (John Fine’s The Early Medieval Balkans), you will immediately see that the content there does not match what you have written. Further, Wikipedia has a policy of using the common English academic name in articles, so that we use the standard English academic name, Old Church Slavonic, here. Please provide discussion and sufficient academic sources to contradict this if possible, and refrain from further reverting until you have done so. Also see the pages on disruptive editing and neutral point of view for a better understanding of Wikipedia policy. Vorziblix (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vorziblix (talk) 18:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at Boris I of Bulgaria shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Katietalk 19:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Vorziblix (talk) 21:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nyttend (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2016 (UTC)