User talk:165.225.50.178

AfC notification: Draft:James MacKillop has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James MacKillop. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James MacKillop (author) has been accepted
 James MacKillop (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 23:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=James_MacKillop_(author) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to In re Alappat, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fluke Corporation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jebcubed (talk) 21:48, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.