User talk:165.230.225.88/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Article Name: Arthropod eye

This article does not have irrelevant information regarding arthropod eyes. Nothing was distracting, in fact the images that were posted were very useful. Most of the citations are from the late 1900s and only a few are from the early 2000s, so it would be helpful if there were sources that were recently published and not out of date. There could be more information added to the "Genetic Controls" section and the "Myriapods" section. Also, this article discusses mainly the evolution of arthropod eyes, but becomes disorganized and a bit jumbled when discussing the anatomy and function of arthropod eyes. It would be helpful if this information was organized so that there were subheadings for different eye types mentioned, like dichoptic, cycloptic, and holoptic; instead of just grouping this all in one section under "Anatomical distribution of compound eyes". An improvement for this article could be the organization of actual information. There is one section called "Horseshoe crab" and another called "Insects and crustaceans". There should be sub sections that separate broader topics such as insects or crustaceans, and under those sections, more specific examples pertaining to the species/organism.

This article is neutral in tone. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position in this article. This article focuses mainly on the evolution of arthropod eyes, which is overrepresented when compared to the the anatomy and function of the arthropod eyes.

All the links work properly and the sources support the claims in the article. Each fact is cited properly in the article except for the first fact in the first paragraph that states "Some caterpillars appear to have evolved compound eyes from simple eyes in the opposite fashion." The citations come from scientific journals and books, so the references are reliable and appropriate.

There are no conversations about this topic on the Talk page. This article is not part of the WikiProjects and is a C-class article. This Wikapedia article is very broad, where the articles we would strive to write would be more specific and about one species.