User talk:165.85.226.254

Why such a focus on his shortcomings?
This page truly reads as if it was written by someone with a fierce personal vendetta against Johan Hari. It is one thing to mention that he has been accused of (and admitted to) instances of plagiarism. It is another entirely to devote the enormous amount of space on this page to cover each incident in detail, and to even include multiple references to the scandals in his introductory paragraph. The focus of this page is more on these incidents than it is on his actual work! Which is problematic, considering he's an influential and oft-cited author. And no, I have no connection whatsoever to Hari or even really know all that much about him. This article just stands out as shockingly biased. 165.85.226.254 (talk) 22:13, 17 July 2024 (UTC)