User talk:166.89.112.6

January 2012
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.  Ravenswing  04:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:08, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I. Calabe1992 05:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.  Ravenswing  06:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  19:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:List of surviving veterans of World War I. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 22:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Florence Green is not a veteran.