User talk:166qq

Sources that don't meet WP:RS guidelines
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 03:04, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!
umm yeah hello excuse me but some of the things you said about George w bush are kinda false the war was justified and that's just my view ok.

hello i like vaporwave and cartoons AND YES I'M AN ADULT. 16:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC) 

Serious word of advice here
Read WP:IBAN.

Pretend that that's how your threat calling for LovelyGirl7 to be site banned ended, with an IBAN between the both of you.

Calling her a bigot and a ponzi scammer were a violation of WP:NPA. Doing so after you pushed for her to be immediately site banned (the sort of treatment we give Nazi pedophiles) for mentioning Will Ferrell, with a pretty clear political motivation -- well, that makes you the disruptive editor here.

The more you push at WP:AN for any action to be taken against LovelyGirl7, the more likely those actions are to apply to you. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Like, if you had caught me in a different mood, I probably would have blocked you for this. And I can't say that some other admin won't.  You might actually want to leave a message at WP:AN to the effect of "OK, nevermind, sorry" to discourage that.  Ian.thomson (talk) 04:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

<>.

May 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:166qq
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

–Ammarpad (talk) 05:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Really, your defending dictator LovelyGirl7
There is virtually no chance you will be allowed back on  Wikipedia. Don't bother trying. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Note for UTRS Admin
Please see THIS AN thread, deleted user page, redacted user talk, and remaining live edits. Cheers. --Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 06:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Neil N  talk to me 06:04, 6 May 2018 (UTC)