User talk:167.104.7.3

August 2008

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia.  Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed.  All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source.  If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them.  Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do.  Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  Philip Trueman (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. StaticGull Talk  13:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Sin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. StaticGull Talk  13:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Darth Vader has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 19:39, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page John Adams (TV miniseries) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://thehistorytavern.blogspot.com/2010/09/history-in-film-john-adams-hbo.html. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

February 2013
Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jorge Juan because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 00:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ron Powlus, you may be blocked from editing. Cmckain (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2014
Hello, I'm Electric Wombat. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Savings bonds without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Electric Wombat (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016
Hello, I'm Satellizer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christmas in July has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Satellizer el Bridget (Talk)  13:02, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2016
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Statehood movement in the District of Columbia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Perryprog (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2021
Hello, I'm Perryprog. I noticed that in this edit to Statehood movement in the District of Columbia, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Perryprog (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Josh Campbell—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:56, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Statehood movement in the District of Columbia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Racoony RE  Message meContributions 16:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Statehood movement in the District of Columbia, you may be blocked from editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Statehood movement in the District of Columbia. Racoony RE  Message meContributions 16:52, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Brian Stelter—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. SunDawn (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Stelter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 13:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 14:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Justiyaya. Your recent edit to The 1619 Project appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justiyaya (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The 1619 Project. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Justiyaya (talk) 13:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The 1619 Project, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Leschnei. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Josh Campbell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Leschnei (talk) 23:29, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Josh Campbell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)