User talk:167.58.226.126

October 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kfar Aza. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Reliable sources call it a "massacre", so that is what Wikipedia refers to it as. —C.Fred (talk) 11:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Well if the attack to Kfar Aza was a "massacre" then how come the IDF incurssions into the West Bank are "battles" or "operations"? Wikipedia neutrality huh? My edits are not breaking any links you Nazi. 167.58.226.126 (talk) 11:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. If you cannot participate civilly, you will lose your ability to participate. —C.Fred (talk) 12:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * "Reliable sources call it" - Reliable sources say Zionists are Nazis, yet I don not see wikipedia allowing us to say it. 167.58.226.126 (talk) 12:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Which reliable sources are those? —C.Fred (talk) 12:04, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * https://labourbriefing.org/blog/2019/7/30/six-holocaust-survivors-compare-zionist-policy-to-that-of-the-nazis for example, but it is useless to attempt to have Wikipedia be truly "neutral". A waste of time. 167.58.226.126 (talk) 12:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kfar Aza, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your edits are breaking links to other articles. It is hard to interpret this as anything other than intentional vandalism.'' —C.Fred (talk) 11:53, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Since your actions have precipitated the protection of the Kfar Aza article, I feel obliged to alert you to Wikipedia's policies around contentious topics. —C.Fred (talk) 12:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)