User talk:167.98.191.123

December 2022
Hello, I'm EnIRtpf09b. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Les Battersby have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 09:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Les Battersby. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 09:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Les Batterby, you may be blocked from editing. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 09:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Les Battersby. EnIRtpf09b chat with me 09:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Mel Gaynor. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk)  14:39, 17 November 2023 (UTC)