User talk:168.174.253.82

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cat anatomy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cat anatomy was changed by 168.174.253.82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958314 on 2017-05-10T21:14:09+00:00.

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Icosidodecahedron— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2017
Hello, I'm Pepper. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mesoamerica— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  " Pepper "  @ 18:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sustainable landscaping have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Tucson Gem & Mineral Show, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Raymond Poincaré— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 20:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Band-Aid— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Red Phoenix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Classical architecture— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Red Phoenix talk  14:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Classical architecture. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:54, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Classical architecture was changed by 168.174.253.82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868992 on 2018-10-24T14:54:57+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Classical architecture. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Citizen Canine (talk) 14:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Gaelan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gallaudet University— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Gaelan 💬✏️ 16:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at July 19. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 20:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.