User talk:168.221.158.52

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Article (grammar), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Article (grammar) was changed by 168.221.158.52 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-30T16:03:27+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2009 (UTC)  You have been blocked for vandalism. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Appealing a block. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to John Williams, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:
 * Click here to submit a false positive report.
 * [ Edit this page] and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Dickens. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Ian Cairns (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at John Dickens, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ian Cairns (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eduardo with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Damian (given name), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 23:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Operation: Mindcrime, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Operation: Mindcrime was changed by 168.221.158.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853917 on 2012-02-10T16:04:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bull has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bull was changed by 168.221.158.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933446 on 2013-08-29T13:28:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Vsmith (talk) 18:52, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of people of the Salem witch trials. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   19:06, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Timeline of extinctions without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of Cuba with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Economy of Cuba with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of weapons in the American Civil War, you may be blocked from editing. ...GELongstreet (talk) 19:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Doniago. Your recent edit to the page Shrek the Third appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sleipnir. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:12, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David. Serols (talk) 15:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Kindergarten have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 16:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kindergarten. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 17:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kindergarten, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 17:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kindergarten. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 17:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)