User talk:168.229.254.54

July 2019
Hello, I'm Gadfium. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sam Neill, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - gadfium 21:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sam Neill, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  13:59, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Tim Conway. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CLCStudent (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit war
Your recent editing history at Brian Meehl shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Antique  Rose  19:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Antique  Rose  07:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Antique  Rose  21:53, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Antique  Rose  19:36, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 168.229.254.54, has made edits to Stuart Adamson that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Pulpfiction621 (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Morgantown, Kentucky, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. ''Stop adding broken wikilinks. Stop using the unencyclopedic and pointless euphemism “shy of” in Vance Colvig. Stop adding periods to a sentence fragment MOS:CAPFRAG like in white sugar. Stop edit warring WP:3RR. Users can be blocked for these things.'' — Smuckola(talk) 18:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)