User talk:168.245.198.74

November 2017
Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month/Participants— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jean Kahwaji. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 19:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chastisement has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chastisement was changed by 168.245.198.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963532 on 2018-02-05T20:37:49+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chastisement, you may be blocked from editing.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 20:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to St. George's School (Vancouver)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Keith (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 15:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Rhinoceros Party— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)


 * When you blank 80% of an article, as you did here in five edits, you'd better have a very good reason for it, and explain it carefully in the edit summaries and at the same time on the talk page of the article. As it is, it looks like vandalism to me. Further edits of this type may lead to a loss of editing privileges.  Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 08:37, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dorset culture. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 19:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dorset culture, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Sandy14156. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andrew Onderdonk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.  Sandy 141  56  :)  17:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andrew Onderdonk. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andrew Onderdonk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Onderdonk. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Andrew Onderdonk was changed by 168.245.198.74 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95196 on 2019-06-19T17:15:01+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to William Cornelius Van Horne, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Onderdonk. CLCStudent (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vancouver College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vancouver College, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 04:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rhinoceros Party—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)