User talk:168.9.213.35

September 2016
Hello, I'm Haploidavey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Roman Empire have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Haploidavey (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Roman Empire has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Energy in Australia— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Plankton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 18:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Plankton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:57, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to BetFred League of Legends— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Non-Dropframe    talk  16:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Riot Games. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Non-Dropframe    talk  16:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1960s has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 1960s was changed by 168.9.213.35 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965679 on 2017-05-02T14:10:10+00:00.