User talk:169.229.11.164

April 2017
Hello, I'm Justeditingtoday. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Friedrich Nietzsche have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Justeditingtoday (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Justeditingtoday (talk) 23:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Friedrich Nietzsche. Justeditingtoday (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 23:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Roberto Mangabeira Unger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jdcomix (talk) 22:58, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, I'm Toddy1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Aleksandr Dugin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddy1 (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aleksandr Dugin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Dugin explicitly says Communism, Fascism, and Liberalism are the three Forms the Fourth Politcal Theory leaves behind. It's absurd to make an article which deliberately and polemically contradicts this, through a wild rationalization, and a clear deprecatory term.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Aleksandr Dugin, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * If you want to delete the sourced content, and input new info, then back up your claimed with independent, reliable source with inline citation. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 19:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aleksandr Dugin. I don't see anything disruptive about the information. INeedSupport(Care free to give me support?) 19:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Aleksandr Dugin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Endymion.12 (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Editing from this IP address has been blocked again, this time for a much longer period, because of persistent disruptive editing by the same person who made the last block necessary. The principal problems have been edit-warring and editing to promote a point of view. Wikipedia works by consensus and discussion, not by each individual editor persistently plugging his or her personally preferred version over and over again, presumably in the hope that eventually others will give up, with the result that the most stubborn editor gets his or her way. Every one of us can express an opinion on how an article should present information, and can argue for that view in discussions, but every one of us will sometimes find that consensus is against us, and in that case it is necessary to accept consensus, no matter how strongly we believe that consensus is mistaken.

Since the same person has also edited disruptively from other IP addresses I shall also protect the most recently affected article for a short time. It will be perfectly possible to protect it for much longer, but I hope the disruptive editor involved will not make that necessary, as doing so might cause inconvenience for some legitimate editors, as well as stopping the disruptive editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:45, 29 November 2018 (UTC)