User talk:169.239.28.210

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (169.239.28.210) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! — Paleo Neonate  – 11:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

You can’t use Wikipedia as a source or religious texts to make an argument
See WP:VERIFY and WP:NOR. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Unless I'm mistaken, only the Watchtower claims that the destruction was in 607 BCE. But Wikipedia should present the view of the scholarly consensus as much as possible. On the other hand, it has mentions in some Jehovah's Witnesses related articles like at. I highly recommend reading the links provided above, but in short, Wikipedia material should be a summary of reliable secondary sources and cite them (more links: WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:RS/AC). This is also true for holy scriptures, the interpretation or analysis must be that of a source rather than the editor's understanding. Wikipedia can also not be used as a source, it would result in circular "citogenesis"; Wikipedia is also user-generated (WP:USERGEN). — Paleo Neonate  – 11:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Adding: after my initial post I noticed that the address is indeed affiliated. I'm not sure if WP:COI/WP:DISCLOSE apply here, it would if the editing was in an official capacity, not really if it's a good faith attempt by someone with personal convictions who was not asked by the organization to edit Wikipedia. — Paleo Neonate  – 11:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)