User talk:169.244.132.200

June 2017
Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Whitefield, Maine— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —72 talk 13:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cape Cod— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –72 (talk) 15:44, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I noticed that you recently removed content from 34 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 14:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Howard Carter, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DatGoodDude342 (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Howard Carter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 16:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Howard Carter, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Howard Carter was changed by 169.244.132.200 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957079 on 2018-05-02T16:31:05+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to William J. Brennan Jr.— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:20, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to William J. Brennan Jr.. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of Carillon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Carillon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 17:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Carillon, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 17:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.