User talk:169.244.134.130

April 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas More. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- lucasbfr talk 17:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas More. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. GavinTing 17:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas More, you will be blocked from editing. -- lucasbfr talk 17:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Philip Trueman 17:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Thomas More (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas More, you will be blocked from editing. — Nivix talk 17:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to 1930s, you will be blocked from editing. — Nivix talk 14:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Waggers 14:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC) Waggers 14:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Seed 2.0 17:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --OnoremDil 17:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. · AndonicO Talk 18:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Metrication in the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Metrication in the United States was changed by 169.244.134.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954847 on 2013-09-24T12:42:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to William Whipple has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Whipple was changed by 169.244.134.130 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952038 on 2013-10-10T12:32:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that you recently removed all content from John Deere, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.   Wikipelli Talk   18:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samuel Colt with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 19:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm Andy4789. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tardigrade because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  17:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Colonial High School. Thank you. andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  17:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American Pie Council. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Widr (talk) 17:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Agalychnis callidryas because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Agalychnis callidryas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agalychnis callidryas, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 17:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Agalychnis callidryas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anaxial (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014
Hello, I'm Ogress. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Beheading of St. John the Baptist because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ogress smash! 19:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beheading of St. John the Baptist, you may be blocked from editing. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vandalism - September 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Legendary, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 12.180.133.18 (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Legendary. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 12.180.133.18 (talk) 14:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 12.180.133.18 (talk) 14:18, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Roman Catholicism in Brazil— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roman Catholicism in Brazil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 14:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Roman Catholicism in Brazil, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not restart your disruptive editing. Your edit of Talk:Mount Everest was vandalism and has been reverted. Repeated vandalism will result in the loss of editing privileges. Apuldram (talk) 15:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Culture of the Southern United States, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 18:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017
Hello, I'm AmaryllisGardener. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Call of the Wild have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Amaryllis Gardener  talk 18:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.  General Ization  Talk   17:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Totem pole. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vanstrat (talk) 14:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Totem pole, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Justiyaya. Your recent edit(s) to the page Saint Dominic Academy (Maine) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Justiyaya (talk) 12:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)