User talk:169.244.3.210

March 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of the Virginia Tech shooting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please particularly refrain from doing this in situations which could cause upset. Vesuvio14 (talk) 17:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Irreversible Damage. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. POLITANVM talk 12:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Irreversible Damage. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. POLITANVM  talk 14:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

September 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jxdn. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:38, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rabban Bar Sauma have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rabban Bar Sauma was changed by 169.244.3.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882203 on 2022-11-02T17:55:30+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rabban Bar Sauma. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. A Rose Wolf  17:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)