User talk:170.10.231.232

March 2022
Hello, I'm TartarTorte. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Embassy of Russia, Ottawa seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TartarTorte 01:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Embassy of Russia, Ottawa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Embassy of Russia, Ottawa, you may be blocked from editing. Jackfork (talk) 23:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Embassy of Russia, Ottawa. Jackfork (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Interstatefive. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Embassy of Russia, Ottawa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.  interstatefive  (talk) - just another roadgeek 19:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Perfect4th. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Embassy of Russia, Ottawa seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Perfect4th (talk) 23:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Embassy of Russia, Ottawa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Embassy of Russia, Ottawa was changed by 170.10.231.232 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884897 on 2022-04-06T23:20:42+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Embassy of Russia, Ottawa, you may be blocked from editing. Le Marteau (talk) 23:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Eric S. Schmitt—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 00:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric S. Schmitt. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eric S. Schmitt was changed by 170.10.231.232 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918491 on 2022-06-26T00:49:33+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eric S. Schmitt, you may be blocked from editing. P HANTOM T ECH (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eric S. Schmitt. P HANTOM T ECH (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Would you advise what is untrue with my comment please. Regards. 170.10.231.232 (talk) 01:05, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @170.10.231.232 You need to provide a reliable source for information you add, do so with a neutral point of view and add them to the article in a way that makes sense instead of replacing random parts of the article with it. P HANTOM T ECH (talk) 01:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * ok, thank you for the clarification. I'll update with references from now on.  Cheers! 170.10.231.232 (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2022 (UTC)