User talk:170.85.6.164

December 2023
Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kansas Jayhawks men's basketball—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Marleeashton. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Sam Francis (writer). However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Marleeashton (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The first two paragraphs of the introduction catalogue some of the theories and remarks that some today may consider racist. There is no need, in the very first sentence, to reduce his work to "white supremacist," which is really just an invective, not an intellectual classification. Racism may be a notable attribute of his work, and perhaps (likely) a deep conviction, but his project was so much larger than this. He was the late 20th/early 21st century successor of James Burnham among conservatives. The core insights of his work concern the soft tyranny of the professional-managerial class, the dangers of immigration, and the futility of the neocon-led Republican Party. He is widely admired by many on the Right today (and even some on the Left), and at the least, deserves our attention as an intellectual foundation of Trumpism. By reducing him to a "white supremacist writer" in the first sentence -- on the basis of what he was called by the same cosmopolitan institutions he spent his life criticizing -- you contaminate this page with partisanship and risk deterring readers from exploring one of the most influential thinkers to this current political moment (for better, or more likely, for worse). 170.85.6.164 (talk) 00:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I take it you are not familiar with WP:RS and WP:OR yet. Have a look at those two links, as your screed here most definitely falls into the category of the latter, and makes it apparent you have not read the former. Fred Zepelin (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)