User talk:171.49.226.26

February 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hindi, you may be blocked from editing. What language(s) they use in Bollywood movies has absolutely nothing to do with what the constitution says about Hindi eventually becoming the working language within the administration of India... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 17:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

When constitution says how Hindi language is to be evolved or vocabulary adopted, it is applicable to Hindi in all spheres of its usage. When a movie is claimed to be in Hindi language, it should follow the stipulations of the applicable language laws. The intention of my content to highlight that constitution of India is not adhered in some Hindi moves by inserting non Indian languages. English is not a native language of India and lacks India-ness (a constitutional requirement also) or not closely related language but it is one of the national language. Constitution stipulates to adopt Sanskrit vocabulary on first preference basis and Sanskrit is not devoid of vocabulary for suitable addition/replacements in Hindi (if required) to take recourse to English/ Arabic/Persian/Turkish/etc. My content says that constitutional stipulations for Hindi usage is not being followed by the Hindi movies which is known to all people who watch Hindi movies and not contradicted by you also.

When the Article is about Hindi language, why are you more bothered about other languages (nothing is written bad about other languages). If you are not bothered about what is written in Indian constitution on this issue, what is the need of discussing at length about its official language / national language status as given the constitution. If you (editors) are threatening the genuine editors and not caring Indian Constitution which Wikipedia policy will not permit, first you give a statement that you do not have vested/biased interest on this topic/article and not biased towards India by disclosing your nationality and your competence of Hindi language in your ID page.

The way Wikipedia senior editors are censoring the content to their bias/sentiments is not in its interest and reducing the scope of funds collection from its readers and well wishers. One editor is deleting the content in advance saying he would discuss but not discussing even after a week. One editor uses the wording 'not in good faith". Is it good faith to support other languages instead of Hindi in a page writing on Hindi? I asked the interested editors to discuss in the Talk page of the Article. But you are sending a threatening message instead of discussing in the Talk page such that it will be possible for viewers to know about it. My advise is do not waste your time on editing reasonable content and there is plenty of vandalism/graffiti to be rectified in many articles if you really want to contribute productively for the betterment of Wikipedia. I strongly desire it should be discussed in the Talk page and not here. Please reply. 171.49.226.26 (talk) 19:06, 20 February 2018 (UTC)