User talk:172.109.141.10

April 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Saiga-12— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saiga-12. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Saiga-12 was changed by 172.109.141.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906424 on 2018-04-25T18:37:42+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Saiga-12, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gomer Pyle. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gomer Pyle was changed by 172.109.141.10 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.920569 on 2018-04-26T11:49:25+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. JC7V -constructive zone  22:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Ubiquity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Spock have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James T. Kirk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.