User talk:172.113.61.144

Why does this article not address the actual substance of the Movie. Why is there no presentation of the other side? Has Wikipedia become a propaganda machine? The movie is about one of the lead authors who happened to be the statistician and claims that he was told to manipulate the data. Clearly he still works at the CDC so they think he is credible, yet no mention of what his claims were or why they are false if in fact they are. Just using logical fallacies to shoot the messenger rather than present the arguments for or against the message. How is that in line with wikipedia's mission?