User talk:172.115.10.30

February 2018
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Stockton, California. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. William Thweatt TalkContribs 23:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:33, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm PohranicniStraze. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tamerlan Tsarnaev have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sara Gilbert, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sara Gilbert was changed by 172.115.10.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8856 on 2018-05-30T07:31:49+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:31, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dunkin' Donuts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BegbertBiggs (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Talk:Peter Strzok. - MrX 🖋 11:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Avenues (gang) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 19:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 19:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:172.115.10.30, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 19:32, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

pussie

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deep state in the United States. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Deep state in the United States was changed by 172.115.10.30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956863 on 2018-07-21T20:57:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

EAT ME!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Deep state in the United States. Solarparade (talk) 20:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mile 22, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 03:00, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Wasn't me dip S**** Get your facts straight next time before making threats nerd.

May 2019
Please refer to MOS:ERA. Thanks. El_C 05:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I'm Jusdafax. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chicano Park, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jusdafax (talk) 06:13, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rashida Tlaib. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- OliviaZoe0 ❤️  (She/her) (talk ) 18:41, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Electrum, you may be blocked from editing. Plant surfer 10:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jackie Brown. Serols (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Xiuhtezcatl Martinez. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bowler the Carmine (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Xiuhtezcatl Martinez. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bowler the Carmine (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add irrelevant or pejorative links to the See also section information into articles, as you did at Latinx. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. Mathglot (talk) 10:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fort Parker massacre—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * "American Indian" is actually the correct term to use despite your claim this was vandalism. Since "Native Americans" includes Polynesians/ Hawaiians--- as well as Eskimos and Aleutians, it is silly to say this massacre was done by "Native Americans".     Plains Indians of the Kiowa, Comanche, Apache, etc are preferably called AMERICAN-Indians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.115.10.30 (talk) 07:33, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The generally accepted terms for those groups are Native Hawaiians and Alaskan Natives, respectively. They’re classified differently than Native Americans under United States law. We go with what reliable sources call them. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 01:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)


 * What is a "generally accepted term" in the first place? "Negro" used to be generally accepted. As already stated, the Fort Parker massacre was not done by "Native Americans" that is far too broad a term. It was done by American Indians. Otherwise why not just say the massacre was done by Homo Sapiens if it isn't important to be specific about which humans were involved?  Politically correct "speak" is wrought with problems--- especially if the ability to be specific takes a back seat to all inclusive language and terminology. To anyone unfamiliar with North American indigenous peoples they might assume that Eskimos did the massacre unless the language is specific.  Don't worry, American Indian tribes aren't ashamed to be know as American Indians as I am one of them. Crow nation in fact. Want to be even more specific then name the tribe, we appreciate that even more.