User talk:172.173.55.86

What I offer here is an involved yet detached look at 172.173.55.86's epigrams. Perhaps time, further study, and more reflection will either modify or enrich the analysis offered here, but my prayers go out to everyone who was hurt by 172.173.55.86. The first thing I want to bring up is that contrary to my personal preferences, I'm thinking about what's best for all of us. My conclusion is that what's best for all of us is for me to hammer out solutions on the anvil of discourse. He insists that national-security interests can and should be sidestepped whenever his personal interests are at stake. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he perpetrates. 172.173.55.86 should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to challenge his effrontive assumptions about merit.

It's astounding that 172.173.55.86 has somehow found a way to work the words "syncategorematically" and "deintellectualization" into his revenge fantasies. However, you may find it even more astounding that he wants to violate values so important to our sense of community. It gets better: He actually believes that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. I guess no one's ever told him that he is stepping over the line when he attempts to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats -- way over the line. 172.173.55.86 refuses to come to terms with reality. He prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. While I can't speak for anyone else, I contend that anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that implying that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to 172.173.55.86's insipid prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers is no different from implying that unbalanced meanies aren't ever snippy. Both statements are ludicrous. The only weapons 172.173.55.86 has in his intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all he has, and he knows it.

172.173.55.86 refers to a variety of things using the word "philodestructiveness". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that he has a duty to conceal the facts and lie to the rest of us, under oath if necessary, perjuring himself to help disseminate the True Faith of Trotskyism, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, if a cogent, logical argument entered his brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Who is he to decide what is morally acceptable for us and what is not? 172.173.55.86 is deeply involved emotionally in his attack on truth and reality. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.