User talk:172.59.215.98

April 2024
Hello, I'm Pi.1415926535. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Tobin Bridge have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tobin Bridge. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tobin Bridge. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 22:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hi 172.59.215.98! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Interstate 95 in Maine several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Response
What? I was just expressing why i reverted his edit, it felt like bigotry rather than quality control.

Unblock request

 * You need to read WP:NPA. It was not just in bad taste. Personal attacks are disruptive. As the blocking admin, I will let another review your unblock request. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping to . 331dot (talk) 07:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @331dot@Ad Orientem: This IP user continues to make disruptive edits at Tobin Bridge, including an edit summary of "just give up", and refuses to engage at Talk:Tobin Bridge. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Yea because if i do it will result in a admin bias. 172.59.215.98 (talk) 22:10, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * A content dispute is not an administrator issue; admins do not settle content disputes. Behavior like edit warring, however, is. 331dot (talk) 22:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * no the suggestion itself will be shot down by you admins because of my past actions. 172.59.215.98 (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @172.59.215.98 Play nice. This is a collaborative project and requires civil and constructive interaction with other editors. That is not optional. You are not required to agree all the time. But you are required to be civil and respect WP:CONSENSUS. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The past is the past. A content dispute is not an admin issue. 331dot (talk) 22:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Exactly. 172.59.215.98 (talk) 23:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Reblocked for a week for continuing to make personal attacks after the block was lifted. Mackensen (talk) 16:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Mackensen (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2024 (UTC)