User talk:172.88.81.94

December 2017
Hello, I'm Theinstantmatrix. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Rolling Stone seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:41, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Rolling Stone. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)


 * More specifically, Wikipedia articles should not contain self-promotion or personal information or views. As further information, please see What Wikipedia is not and Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, personal opinions, commentary, advocacy, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Biographies of living persons, Five Pillars, Identifying reliable sources, Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, No original research, Words to watch and Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Los Angeles Times, you may be blocked from editing. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)