User talk:173.161.84.145

Recent edits to The Wiz
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. We recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with our policies so we maycollaborate in the future. Thank you! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 02:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Princess Ozma because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Wizard of Oz (1939 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, I'm K scheik. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Wizard Of Oz without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! k_scheik (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of all-time NBA win-loss records— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 19:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of all-time NBA win-loss records. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of all-time NBA win-loss records, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 19:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of all-time NBA win-loss records. Serols (talk) 19:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)