User talk:173.165.165.117

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from White Mountains (New Hampshire). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Permanent marker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Permanent marker was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954358 on 2011-01-21T18:52:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Permanent marker. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Wikipelli  Talk   18:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Permanent marker. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

March 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Surcouf. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pringles has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pringles was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903458 on 2016-02-18T17:19:31+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Electromagnet. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Electromagnet have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019
Hello, I'm D Eaketts. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dionysus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. D Eaketts (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dionysus. --Mr Fink (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Fall of Five have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Flami72. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cats (musical) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Flami72 (talk) 16:25, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Fall of Five—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Fall of Five. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Fall of Five was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916313 on 2020-09-09T18:29:00+00:00

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rome, Georgia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rome, Georgia was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954237 on 2021-01-28T20:11:03+00:00

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Fuzheado &#124; Talk 20:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Religious views on euthanasia have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:04, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Religious views on euthanasia was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961927 on 2021-03-23T13:04:22+00:00

May 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bernard of Clairvaux have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bernard of Clairvaux was changed by 173.165.165.117 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93089 on 2022-05-13T16:13:25+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bernard of Clairvaux. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 16:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bernard of Clairvaux, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 16:14, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Tropicalkitty. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Vitruvian Man—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tropicalkitty (talk) 17:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vitruvian Man. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bigcheese26 (talk) 17:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)