User talk:173.17.236.138

Posting the actual content of the Wiki-page first, before the history, is not vandalism. In order to provide people with timely, accurate information, it is important that the subject matter of the Web Page be put first, prior to the 'history' and backstory. This is not vandalism and it would appear that your change would seem to be if you are undermining the values of Wikipedia.


 * Please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia Manual of Style, which specifically says: "The first sentence should tell the nonspecialist reader what, or who, the subject is." NewEnglandYankee (talk) 04:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Fourteen Words has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Fourteen Words was changed by 173.17.236.138 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860493 on 2018-06-30T04:13:34+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fourteen Words, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 04:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Fourteen Words shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Your edit has been reverted several times. Do not restore the edit without prior discussion on the article's talk page.'' Sum mer PhD v2.0 16:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.