User talk:173.212.124.217

November 2021
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you recently removed content from Constitution of the People's Republic of China without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 16:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Oopsemoops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 18:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, you may be blocked from editing. Amigao (talk) 17:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at ByteDance, you may be blocked from editing. 173.212.124.217 (talk) 17:52, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Harobouri T • C (he/him) 11:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Normchou   💬 16:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Normchou  💬 16:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to argue the decision you made, but I just want to know - we were in the middle of discussion and consensus-building when another person barged in and reverted the edits that lead to the edit war. Sure, block me, but how was their action not in direct contempt of that consensus-building that was going on? How am I at fault when I was the one who was trying to un-do the continuation of an edit war they started back up? I'm genuinely curious here as I am a new editor and in my limited understanding do not see how fault is to be placed solely on me. Thank you. 173.212.124.217 (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Confucius Institute, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:173.212.124.217. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. The Night Watch    (talk)   14:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)