User talk:173.216.247.15

Do Not Block Me When I Get Unblocked
 * I have again restored the items that you deleted. You may not delete a declined unblock request while you are still blocked. If this is indicative of how well you will follow guidelines, we may need to extend your block for the good of the project. —C.Fred (talk) 21:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrice O'Neal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Trivialist (talk) 15:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Trivialist (talk) 23:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:45, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:98.17.131.166


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as User talk:98.17.131.166, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hamish Welcome  00:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bless the Harts, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —

I Cannot Wait Any Longer

For what it is worth. I didn't do nothing wrong is a double negative. So says that you are agreeing that you did something wrong. So be wary as your edits here, and your blocks here and elsewhere indicate that you are heading for trouble if you cannot curtail some of your edits. — billinghurst  sDrewth  00:33, 31 May 2021 (UTC)