User talk:173.225.249.246

January 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Claudette Peters— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 12:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Information industry has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Information industry was changed by 173.225.249.246 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888934 on 2016-05-22T12:52:11+00:00.

August 2016
Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hong Kong Phooey without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Auric   talk  18:34, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to S.C.O.O.B., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Order of the British Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Learning through play have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2018
Hello, I'm Dreamy Jazz. I noticed that in this edit to John Gotti, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 12:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John Gotti, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 12:56, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to John Gotti, you may be blocked from editing. Dan Koehl (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Gotti. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2019
Hello, I'm Likes2wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Carbon filtering have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Likes2wiki (talk) 09:27, 20 November 2019 (UTC)