User talk:173.23.106.145

August 2021
Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2015 Rochelle–Fairdale, Illinois tornado, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I have checked official records for this tornado, and the injury count is listed as 11. You would need to provide a reliable source stating otherwise to change that count. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tornado outbreak of March 16–18, 2021. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2015 Rochelle–Fairdale, Illinois tornado, you may be blocked from editing. ''NCEI data only lists 11 injuries for that day. Do not change this figure unless you can provide a reliable source stating otherwise.'' TornadoLGS (talk) 00:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * To avoid edit warring, I won't revert, but NCEI generally supercedes initial survey information. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Your recent editing history at August 2020 Midwest derecho shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Gwennie &#128008; &#xFF5F;💬 📋&#xFF60; 23:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)