User talk:173.238.88.232

April 2022
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, A.P. Bio. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 04:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)


 * i did improve the article it is from my own critical response exclusive to wikipedia, with all information provided so that anyone can check for themselves. it is not worded as an absolute, coming from any authority, rather as a critique from a media analyst (and a damn good one, i might add). as such, t was placed in the appropriate category. my only crime here is not knowing how to hotlink to room 222...nbc's own damn show...and i was actually trying to figure that out. i request that it be returned...it was literally the most relevant thing on that page. other than the episode list. and other basic info. 173.238.88.232 (talk) 04:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
 * the entire purpose of wikipedia is that anyone can add something of value. this is in no way shape or form a controversial edit. and in any conceivable sense certainly added value to that paltry page. 173.238.88.232 (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)