User talk:173.248.193.45

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
There are several problems with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Callum Torrance. In view of those considerations, the page will be speedily deleted. Please also note that people who persist in creating unsuitable pages may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) The reviewer who declined the submission stated that there was no not adequate evidence of the subject's notability, and that appears to be indeed the case. I have been unable to find any confirmation anywhere of any of the claims made in the draft article, except for the fact that there is a boy named "Callum Torrance" at Cardinal Carter Academy. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information about anything, but requires subjects of articles to satisfy certain notability stnadards. There is no evidence anywhere that Callum Torrance (presumably yourself) satisfies those standards.
 * 2) The page is clearly written for no other purpose than promotion of Callum Torrance, telling us in glowing terms how wonderful he is, but Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of any sort, and Wikipedia's policy is that any page which exists purely for promotion may be speedily deleted.
 * 3) Some of the statements made in the draft article would be expected to be verifiable, but no record seems to exist anywhere else of any of those statements. (For example, I would expect the Wholenote magazine's archive to contain a record of the glowing statement it made about you, but it does not.) This leads to the impression that the page may be a hoax, which is also sufficient reason for speedy deletion.