User talk:173.251.82.178

May 2016
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. An edit that you recently made to Wallington High School seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!   Wikipelli Talk   14:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wallington, New Jersey— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Omphalotus olearius has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Omphalotus olearius was changed by 173.251.82.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923422 on 2016-10-05T16:15:06+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Omphalotus illudens. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Omphalotus illudens was changed by 173.251.82.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909967 on 2016-10-05T16:17:39+00:00.

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lego Dimensions has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lego Dimensions was changed by 173.251.82.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872703 on 2016-11-21T17:17:48+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lego Dimensions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshualouie711 (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Samsung Gear S2 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Samsung Gear S2 was changed by 173.251.82.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2016-11-28T17:06:42+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy S7, you may be blocked from editing. Dat GuyTalkContribs 17:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy S7. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Willondon (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm What cat?. An edit that you recently made to World of Coca-Cola seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 17:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at World of Coca-Cola. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 17:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wallington, New Jersey. – 🐈? (talk) (ping me!) 17:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ice axe— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:46, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tea Act. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 14:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to South Carolina have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of ships attacked by Somali pirates—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of ships attacked by Somali pirates. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaoru Mitoma, you may be blocked from editing. Yoshi24517 Chat   Online  19:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Samara Joy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AP 499D25 (talk) 13:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Dr. Van Nostrand. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Narcissus (mythology) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dr. Van Nostrand (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Chromebook. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. 64andtim ( talk to me ) 14:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm Alon Alush. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to JH—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Alon Alush (talk) 18:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)